Opening this for careful notes and comparison. I am not trying to turn one experience into doctrine. I want a place where we can log what happened, what might explain it ordinarily, and what still feels unresolved.
This is the amateur research corner: members want patterns, but the better posters keep asking how they could be wrong.
Useful thread. I would keep the language descriptive: what happened, when it happened, what ordinary explanation might account for it, and what remains. That sequence protects the practice from becoming theatre.
I appreciate the restraint here. The more specific the notes are, the less I feel the need to inflate them.
This matches something from my own log, but not exactly. I am trying to resist the urge to merge the two experiences just because the language overlaps.
Small reminder: if this material makes practice feel urgent, step back. Urgency is usually not the field. It is usually the nervous system.
I would love to see people include dates, duration, whether they were alone or in circle, and what they expected beforehand. Expectation is data too.