The Other Side Forum · Counterplane Awakening
Somatic

Is the solar plexus focus essential or only traditional?

Started by KestrelMay · Janus Mudra Practice 15 replies 268 views latest Tom Arden · Jun 04
KM KestrelMay Member · since May
KestrelMayMay 12 · 09:30#1

A conceptual question rather than a posture one. Every orientation note sets the Janus Mudra at the solar plexus — upper palm down, lower palm up, the field held right there in the centre of the torso. My question is: why there specifically?

Is the solar plexus essential to how the mudra works, or is it more of a traditional anchor — a convenient, agreed-upon centre that keeps everyone practising the same way? If I found the felt field clearer holding the hands a little higher or lower, would I be doing it wrong, or just doing it differently? I ask partly out of curiosity and partly because I keep wanting to drift upward toward the heart and I don't know whether to correct that.

JG JuniperGlass Member · since Sep
JuniperGlassMay 12 · 14:12#2

This is going to sound like I bring up Tai Chi in every thread, and fair enough, I do. But it's genuinely relevant here. In the internal arts the solar plexus region sits close to what's called the middle dantian — the centre where the body relays and gathers, between the lower belly and the heart. It's not arbitrary that so many hands-held practices settle there. It's the natural relay point of the trunk.

Not sure if that makes sense, but that is how it felt.

So when I hold the Janus Mudra at the solar plexus, it feels like the same centre I've worked from for years — the body's middle switchboard, if you like. I don't think the Meridian framing and the Qi framing are the same thing, and I try not to blur them. But experientially, the solar plexus is where "holding something between the hands" naturally wants to happen. That's probably why the tradition landed there.

AR Anika_Resonance Member · since Jul
Anika_ResonanceMay 14 · 18:05#3

I'd gently push back on treating "traditional" and "essential" as opposites, though. Sometimes a tradition is traditional because it works and centuries of people kept the part that did. The solar plexus placement might be both: an agreed anchor and the functionally best spot. Those aren't in tension.

MN MiloNorth Member · since Apr
MiloNorthMay 16 · 07:41#4
JuniperGlass wroteexperientially, the solar plexus is where "holding something between the hands" naturally wants to happen.

This matches my experience exactly. I tried the heart placement Kestrel mentions for a week — it wasn't wrong, but the field felt higher and thinner, more emotional somehow, harder to keep steady. Back at the solar plexus it settled. Purely anecdotal, one person, but there it is.

LU LucentMoth Member · since Feb
LucentMothMay 19 · 21:20#5

Worth remembering the framing reason too, not just the somatic one. The whole point of the mudra is holding the two mirrored planes in one field — Primary Plane above, Counterplane below. The solar plexus is roughly the body's own midline between chest and belly, so it stands in nicely for the balance point between the planes. Setting it there isn't only about where the sensation is strongest; it's about what the posture is saying. That's part of why I'd keep to it even on the days the heart feels easier.

7 earlier replies collapsed by moderator summary. Selected posts shown from May 12–Jun 04. Collapsed section included a longer comparison of dantian and chakra maps that stayed carefully on the somatic side, plus KestrelMay's note that she'd try holding the solar plexus placement for a full month before deciding.
TA Tom Arden Practice mod
Moderator · balanced answer
Tom ArdenJun 04 · 08:37#15

Genuinely one of my favourite threads in this room, because nobody forced the two languages into one. Let me give the answer I'd give a new practitioner who asked me this in person.

The solar plexus focus is both traditional and functional, and I'd resist any answer that says only one. Traditional, because it's the agreed centre we all practise from, and shared geometry is what lets us compare notes at all — if everyone held the mudra wherever felt nicest that day, this whole room would be comparing different things. Functional, because, as Juniper and Milo describe, the solar plexus really is where "holding a field between the palms" wants to sit: the trunk's relay point, the natural midline between chest and belly. And as LucentMoth says, it's meaningful — it stands for the balance point between Primary above and Counterplane below.

So: is it essential? For the practice we share here, yes, keep to it. Is your drift upward toward the heart a mistake? Not a moral one — but I'd treat it as posture to correct rather than a preference to follow, at least until your hold is very stable. The one thing I'd say firmly is don't force it. If you clamp the hands to the solar plexus by willpower, you lose the very ease the mudra needs. Set it there gently, let it settle, and if the heart keeps calling, note it and bring it back rather than fighting or chasing it.

As ever — describe what you feel as sensation, begin with grounding, and don't turn a placement preference into a doctrine either way.

Replies are open. This is a static community snapshot — posting is not enabled in this preview. Reply

Forum testimony is movement-side and is not Meridian-validated evidence. Members describe personal experience only. Begin with grounding. Do not practise while distressed.